ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients suffering from systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) display poor antibody development after two doses of mRNA vaccinations leaving these patients with only limited humoral protection against severe SARS-CoV-2 disease courses. Of key interest is the effect of conventional synthetic (csDMARD) and biological/ targeted drugs (b/tsDMARDs) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on the time of protection.ObjectivesTo compare antibody titer development in patients with vasculitis and connective tissue disease (CTD) with healthy controls 6 months after two mRNA vaccinations and after third immunization. To analyze factors, that affect the velocity of titer decline, well as qualitative humoral response.MethodsPatients with SARD were enrolled and matched for gender and age with healthy control subjects (HC) and the humoral response after 6 months to two doses of mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in terms of SARS-COV-2 antibody titer was assessed. In addition to binding antibody units (BAU) we also analyzed neutralizing antibodies. Patients receiving B-cell depleting therapy and those with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (via detection of nucleocapsid antibodies) were excluded. Differences between two groups were calculated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsA total of 53 patients with SARD (42 patients suffering from connective tissue disease and 11 with vasculitis respectively) and 73 HC were analysed. Interestingly only patients receiving a combination therapy of different csDMARDs/ b/tsDMARDs demonstrated diminished antibody titers 6 months after two doses of mRNA vaccine (p-value p-value<0,001), whereas patients receiving only csDMARD as monotherapy displayed comparable antibody levels to healthy controls. This effect was equalized after a third booster vaccination (p-value=0,13). Concerning disease entities, patients with vasculitis seemed to have lower BAU than HC (p-value<0,05) and patients suffering from CTD. After third vaccination both patient groups had lower antibody levels than HC (vasculitis: p-value <0,0001;CTD: p-value p-value<0,01). Lower antibody levels before third vaccination correlated with lower antibodies after third immunization.ConclusionPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases undergoing combination therapy may be more vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection, due to reduced antibody levels 6 months following two doses of mRNA vaccine. Our data strongly recommends antibody measurements in patients receiving combination therapy and individualized earlier booster vaccination.Figure 1.Anti-SARS-Cov-2 S antibody titers. A: Antibody titers measured 6 months after two doses of mRNA vaccination in patients with connective tissue disease, vasculitis and healthy controls. B, Antibody levels according to disease entity. AB: antibody;BAU: binding antibody unit;CTD: connective tissue disease;HC: healthy control;mono: disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug monotherapy;combination: combination therapy of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs;RBD: receptor binding domain;[Figure omitted. See PDF]Table 1.Demographic parameters and therapy of study participants.SARD (n=53)HC (n=73)Age, mean (standard deviation)53.55 (±14.04)51.27 (±14.07)Female45 (84.9%)47 (64.4%)Connective tissue disease42 (79%)Vasculitis11 (21%)csDMARD or b/tsDMARD monotherapy22 (41%)csDMARD and/or b/tsDMARD combination therapy13 (25%)No therapy18 (34%)Methotrexate8 (15%)Mycophenolate mofetil10 (19%)Hydroxychloroquine17 (32%)Azathioprine8 (15%)Belimumab3 (6%)Tocilizumab3 (6%)Glucocorticoid dose 1. vaccination, mean (standard deviation)2.8 (±10.8)Glucocorticoid dose 2. vaccination, mean (standard deviation)2.6 (±10.7)SARD: Systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, HC: Healthy controls, csDMARD: conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and b/tsDMARD: biological/ targeted drugs disease modifying antirheumatic drugsREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsElisabeth Simader Speakers bureau: Lilly, Thomas Deimel: None declared, Felix Kartnig: None declared, Selma Tobudic: None declared, Helmuth Hasla her Grant/research support from: Glock Health, BlueSky Immunotherapies and Neutrolis, Thomas Maria Karonitsch: None declared, Daniel Mrak: None declared, Thomas Nothnagl: None declared, Thomas Perkmann: None declared, Helga Lechner-Radner: None declared, Judith Sautner: None declared, Florian Winkler: None declared, Heinz Burgmann Speakers bureau: speaker fees from Shionogi, Pfizer, MSD, Paid instructor for: advisory boards for Valneva, MSD, Gilead, Consultant of: consulting fees from MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, Gilead, Daniel Aletaha Speakers bureau: other from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Grant/research support from: grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Roche, SoBi, Sanofi, Stefan Winkler: None declared, Stephan Blüml Speakers bureau: personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Novartis, Peter Mandl Speakers bureau: reports speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Novartis, Grant/research support from: research grants from AbbVie, BMS, Novartis, Janssen, MSD and UCB.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundLupus is a heterogenous diseases which results in significant premature mortality. Most studies have evaluated risk factors for lupus mortality using regression models which considers the phenotype in isolation. Identifying clusters of patients on the other hand may help overcome the limitations of such analyses.ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to describe the causes of mortality and to analyze survival across clusters based on clinical phenotype and autoantibodies in patients of the Indian SLE Inception cohort for Research (INSPIRE)MethodsOut of all patients, enrolled in the INSPIRE database till March 3st 2022, those who had <10% missing variables in the clustering variables were included in the study. The cause of mortality and duration between the recruitment into the cohort and mortality was calculated. Agglomerative unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using 25 variables that define SLE phenotype in clinical practice. The number of clusters were fixed using the elbow and silhouette methods. Survival rates were examined using Cox proportional hazards models: unadjusted, adjusted for age at disease onset, socio-economic status, steroid pulse, CYC, MMF usage and cluster of the patients.ResultsIndian patients with lupus have significant early mortality and the majority of deaths occurs outside the hospital setting.Out of 2211 patients in the cohort, 2072 were included into the analysis. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 26 (20-33) years and 91.7% were females. There were 288 (13.1%) patients with juvenile onset lupus. The median (range) duration of follow up of the patients was 37 (6-42) months. There were 170 deaths, with only 77 deaths occurring in a health care setting. Death within 6 months of enrollment occured in in 80 (47.1%) patients. Majority (n=87) succumbed to disease activity, 23 to infections, 24 to coexisting disease activity and infection and 21 to other causes. Pneumonia was the leading cause of death (n=24). Pneumococcal infection led to death in 11 patients and SARS-COV2 infection in 7 patients. The hierarchical clustering resulted in 4 clusters and the characteristics of these clusters are represented in a heatmap (Figure-1A,B). The mean (95% confidence interval [95% CI] survival was 39.17 (38.45-39.90), 39.52 (38.71-40.34), 37.73 (36.77-38.70) and 35.80 (34.10-37.49) months (p<0.001) in clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively with an HR (95% CI) of 2.34 (1.56, 3.49) for cluster 4 with cluster 1 as reference(Figure 1C). The adjusted model showed an HR (95%CI) for cluster 4 of 2.22 (1.48, 3.22) with an HR(95%CI) of 1.78 (1.29, 2.45) for low socioeconomic status as opposed to a high socioeconomic status (Table 1).ConclusionIndian patients with lupus have significant early mortality and the majority of deaths occurs outside the hospital setting. Disease activity as determined by the traditional activity measures may not be sufficient to understand the true magnitude of organ involvement resulting in mortality. Clinically relevant clusters can help clinicians identify those at high risk for mortality with greater accuracy.Table 1.Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models predicting mortalityUnivariateMultivariateVariablesHazard ratio (95% Confidence interval)P valueHazard ratio (95% Confidence interval)P valueCluster1Reference-Reference-20.87 (0.57, 1.34)0.5320.89 (0.57, 1.38)0.59831.22 (0.81, 1.84)0.3371.15 (0.76, 1.73)0.51342.34 (1.56, 3.49)<0.0012.22(1.48, 3.22)<0.001Socioeconomic statusLower1.78 (1.29, 2.45)<0.001Pulse steroidYes1.6 (0.99, 2.58)0.051MMFYes0.71 (0.48, 1.05)0.083CYCYes1.42 (0.99, 2.02)0.052Proliferative LNYes0.99 (0.62, 1.56)0.952Date of birth age0.99 (0.98, 1.01)0.657CYC- cyclophosphamide, MMF- Mycophenolate mofetilFigure 1.A. Agglomerative clustering dendrogram depicting the formation of four clusters. B.Heatmap depicting distribution of variables used in clustering C. Kaplan-Meier curve showing the survival function across the 4 clusters[Figure omitted. See PDF]REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone eclared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) under moderate/severe immunosuppression are considered a high-risk population to develop severe Covid-19 infection.ObjectivesThe aim of our study was to describe the clinical characteristics and the outcome of patients with ARD who contracted a Sars-Cov-2 infection.MethodsAmong patients with ARD being followed in our tertiary outpatient rheumatology clinic, we retrospectively identified those infected with SARS-CoV-2 between the beginning of the pandemic and August 2022. Patients' medical files were reviewed for demographics (age, gender and comorbidities) and disease-related characteristics, as well as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) characteristics, including vaccination status, treatment, and outcomes (covid-19 severity, hospitalization, death).ResultsA total of 209 cases of ARD patients with confirmed Covid-19 infection were recorded. Most of them were women (62.7%), with a mean age of 52.4± 13.8 years. The most prevalent ARDs were seronegative spondyloarthropathies (28.7%), systematic lupus erythematosus (21.5%), rheumatoid arthritis (16.5%), and systemic sclerosis (11.5%). More than half of the patients received corticosteroids (57.8%), while the most frequently used immunosuppressants were hydroxychloroquine (30.9%), TNF inhibitors (26.5%), mycophenolate mofetil (24.0%), methotrexate (19.1%) and rituximab (15.2%). One hundred and fifty-eight (76%) patients were either on remission or had mild disease activity. Most of the patients (131/209) had at least one comorbidity, more commonly arterial hypertension (48.5%) and pulmonary disease (45.2%). Most of the patients were vaccinated against Sars-Cov-2 (73.7%), either with two doses (38.0%), three doses (57.0%) or four doses (5.0%) of mRNA-based vaccines. The big majority of the patients (83.3%) were asymptomatic or had mild Covid-19 disease. About half of the patients (53.1%) reported to have received Covid-19 treatment. Thirty-two of them (15.3%) needed hospitalization, and five death cases were reported overall. Among the demographic characteristics, age (p<0.0001 for hospitalization) and comorbidities were associated with worse covid-19 outcomes. In particular, cardiovascular disease (OR 5.37, p=0.001 for covid-19 severity, OR 6.89, p=0.001 for hospitalization), pulmonary disease (OR 3.02, p=0.006 for hospitalization), and obesity (OR 3.46, p=0.044 for hospitalization) had the stronger associations. Non-vaccination status was also associated with a higher risk for hospitalization (OR 2.68, p=0.015). In relation to ARD-related factors, treatment with rituximab (OR 4.11, p=0.002 for hospitalization), systemic sclerosis diagnosis (OR 3.45, p=0.03 for Covid-19 severity) and myositis diagnosis (OR 4.91, p=0.033 for hospitalization) were associated with worse Covid-19 outcomes. On the other hand, spondyloarthropathies appear to be negatively associated with Covid-19 severity (OR=0.27, p=0.035).ConclusionAccording to our study, most ARD patients recovered uneventfully from Covid-19. However, there are several indications that we should be vigilant for patients who remain unvaccinated, are older, have a systemic sclerosis or myositis diagnosis, and/or receive intense immunosuppressive regiments such as rituximab.References[1]Papagoras C, Fragoulis GE, et al. Better outcomes of COVID-19 in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Nov 10.[2]Strangfeld A, Schäfer M, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jul;80(7):930-942.Table 1.N=209ARD Diagnosisn (%)Rheumatoid arthritis34 (16.3)Seronegative spondyloarthropathies60 (28.7)Systemic lupus erythematosus45 (21.5)Systemic sclerosis24 (11.5)Sjogren's syndrome15 (7.2)Vasculitis19 (9.1)Myositis9 (4.3)Other3 (1.4)Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundVaccination against SARS-CoV2 had a critical role in the fight against COVID19 pandemic.A weaker humoral response to COVID19 vaccine has been found in rheumatic patients treated with Rituximab (RTX) or Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF)[1]. Despite the evidence that anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines can elicit a T-cell response [2], some data show that even the cellular immunity could be impaired in rheumatic patients [3] but COVID19 serology is the only parameter that is feasible to measure in daily practice.Tixagevimab+cilgavimab are two human-derived monoclonal antibodies administered parenterally and authorized by regulatory agencies in February 2022 for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) against COVID19 from different virus variants in fragile patients.ObjectivesTo demonstrate safety and effectiveness of tixagevimab+cilgavimab.MethodsPatients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases undergoing immunosuppressive treatment with RTX or MMF during the vaccination campaign were enrolled between April and June 2022. All patients must have anti-spike antibody levels below the protective threshold (defined by anti-spike IgG titre <250 BAU/ml) after receiving at least 2 vaccine doses.Patients were monitored with a questionnaire every month about COVID19 symptoms (including respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms, anosmia and ageusia, skin rash and potential contact with COVID19+ subjects) and were checked for anti-spike and anti-nucleocapside antibodies titres every 2 months for a total of a 6 month follow-up. MMF dose was reduced at 1 g/die at the time of vaccine administration.ResultsFifteen patients were enrolled: 9 participants had a connective tissue disease (CTD;1 dermatomyositis, 3 anti-syntethase syndrome, 4 systemic sclerosis, 1 systemic lupus erythematosus) and 6 had vasculitis (all granulomatosis with polyangiitis). 12 of them received RTX in the preceding 12 months and 3 were taking MMF.About safety, the therapy was very well tolerated and only 4 patients (26%) reported a non-severe adverse event in the 2 weeks following drug administration (2 myalgia, 1 headache, 1 fatigue), none of them requiring hospitalization nor pharmacologic treatment.Regarding effectiveness, 3/15 patients contracted SARS-Cov2 infection (20%) with mild symptoms and no need for hospitalization nor oxygen therapy. Only 1 of them received an antiviral drug (nirmatrelvir+ritonavir). All infected patients had a CTD diagnosis. No significant correlation was observed between the type of rheumatic disease and the risk of infection or response to tixagevimab+cilgavimab.ConclusionNone of our patients developed severe adverse events after tixagevimab+cilgavimab administration and, among the 3 SARS-CoV2 infected patients, none required hospitalization nor oxygen therapy.We conclude that in our experience tixagevimab+cilgavimab is a safe and useful complementary immunization strategy to vaccination for COVID19 prophylaxis.These data will be implemented in a larger study, comprehending various immunocompromised patients from several departments.References[1] Furer et al., Ann Rheum Dis, 2021[2] Mangalakumari et al., Nat Rev Immunol, 2020[3] Picchianti-Diamanti et al., Front Immunol, 2021Charateristic of the cohortIdentificativeAgeDiagnosisRTX/MMFSARS-CoV2 InfectionHospitalizationAntiviral drugs180SScMMF-//270ASSDRTX+nono370ASSDRTX+noyes452GPARTX-//551GPARTX-//649SSc+SSjRTX-//768SScMMF-//847LESRTX-//964ASSDRTX-//1068GPARTX-//1123GPARTX-//1258DMRTX+nono1361SScMMF-//1475GPARTX-//1569GPARTX-//Figure 1.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundAs the third year of the pandemic begins, over 13 billion doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been administrated worldwide and growing evidence on their efficacy and safety in people with RMDs has accrued.ObjectivesTo update our previous systematic literature review (SLR)[1] on efficacy and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)MethodsA literature search according to the PICO framework was conducted on July 22, 2022 to identify references in seven databases published after June 1, 2021 (end date of previous SLR). Title and s were independently screened by 3 investigators (AA, AN and FK). Eligibility criteria were stricter in terms of requirement of the inclusion of control group or undertaking a multivariable analysis. However, for some outcomes (e.g., RMD flares), descriptive studies were also included due to the paucity of data. Data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment were performed as in the previous SLR.ResultsOf 1583 references, 219 were included for full text assessment and 30 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Recent studies confirmed that a full vaccination cycle was generally immunogenic, though the seroconversion rate and the anti-spike antibody (Ab) titre were lower in patients with RMDs compared to healthy controls. Vaccination was also able to induce neutralising antibodies (NAb) but the seroconversion rate and the neutralising activity were lower than in controls. Glucocorticoids, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab and abatacept were negatively associated with Ab and NAb seroconversion. Two studies specifically investigating RTX-treated RMD patients identified an association between lower dose and longer period of time after the last RTX infusion before vaccination and higher likelihood of Ab seroconversion. The majority of breakthrough infections (B-INFs) were asymptomatic and, if symptomatic, mild to moderate. A higher number of vaccine doses was associated with a lower incidence and severity of B-INFs, although B-INF incidence rate was generally higher in the post-delta variant period. Higher disease activity was associated with higher likelihood of severe/critical B-INFs. Regarding safety, in general, patients with RMDs showed higher rates of mild AEs compared to the general population, however severe AEs were rare, if any. Disease flares have been observed in/reported by less than 10% of patients in the various cohorts and although often requiring treatment with glucocorticoids or change of the ongoing immunosuppressive therapy, hospitalization was generally not needed. Pre-vaccination colchicine prophylaxis seemed useful to prevent gout flares in the post-vaccination trimester.ConclusionOverall anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is immunogenic and safe in patients with RMDs. However, careful and individualised assessment of the ongoing therapy and disease activity when planning the vaccination schedule is necessary to minimise the risk of reduced immunogenicity, post-vaccination disease flares and breakthrough infections.Reference[1]Kroon FPB, Najm A, Alunno A, Schoones JW, Landewé RBM, Machado PM, Navarro Compán V. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(3):422-432Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are reduced in adult kidney recipients. After pediatric kidney transplantation there are only few data available - mostly limited to monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Method(s): Cellular and humoral immune responses have been monitored before and after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pediatric kidney recipients. After in vitro stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 antigen (spike glycoprotein) virus-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells (SARS-CoV-2-Tvis) have been identified by cytokine flow cytometry. SARS-CoV-2 IgG was measured by CMIA. Result(s): Immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was analyzed in a total of 30 pediatric kidney recipients (age at 1st vaccine dose 5.2 - 17.8 years, median 14.8 years;43% male;30/30 2 vaccine doses;23/30 3 vaccine doses). At time of vaccination 22 patients (73%) received a tacrolimus (Tac)-based immunosuppression combined with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF;n = 15) or everolimus (n = 6) or neither of them (n = 1);3 patients were exposed to cyclosporine A and 5 patients to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)- free immunosuppression. MMF was used in 18/30 patients. After 1st dose of mRNA vaccine SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detectable in 50% of pediatric kidney recipients, after 2nd dose in 78% and after 3rd dose in 88%. After the 2nd vaccine dose absence of humoral immune response (< 33.8 BAU/ml) was only found in case of MMF use (predominately combined with Tac). Peak IgG values (> 2,080 BAU/ml) were only detected in MMF-free regimens (6/7). Cellmediated response partially differed from humoral response, e. g., in some patients SARS-CoV2-Tvis were found despite lack of virus-specific antibodies. After 1st vaccine dose SARS-CoV-2-Tvis were detectable in 50% of pediatric kidney recipients, after 2nd dose in 92%. After 2nd vaccine dose absence or very low levels of SARS-CoV-2-Tvis (< 0.3 cells/mul) were only found in Tac-based immunosuppressive regimens, whereas higher levels (> 1.3 cells/mul) were exclusively detected in patients with MMFfree medication. Conclusion(s): After pediatric kidney transplantation humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were suboptimal, but more pronounced than in adult kidney recipients. Use of Tac and MMF was associated with impaired immune response to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral response corresponded only partially to cell-mediated response. Additional monitoring of SARS-CoV- 2-Tvis might be recommendable to improve assessment of the individual vaccine response and thereby to personalize the decision on the necessity of further vaccine doses.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the humoral immune response to the third dose (booster) of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who were seronegative after a two-dose regimen. Method(s): Observational study. Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases who had not achieved seroconversion after a two-dose vaccine schedule against SARS-CoV-2 were included. To assess the humoral immune response, anti-RBD IgG (S protein receptor binding domain) neutralizing antibody titers were determined by ELISA (cutoff titer 200). The determination was made between 30 to 45 days after the third dose. Result(s): From 66 patients who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, 18 patients (29.5%) were seronegative after a two-dose schedule. 61% had SLE, 77% had comorbidities (61% with hypertension, p = 0.03). Patients were on treatment: 10 with prednisone (8 with doses greater than 10 mg/d, p = 0.01), 10 with hydroxychloroquine, one with methotrexate, one with leflunomide, four with azathioprine, five with my cophenolatemofetil and five with rituximab (they are the total number of non-responders on biological treatment, p = 0.03). Regarding the primary vaccination regimen, 11 received BBIBP-CorV (p = 0.01), 5 AZD1222, 1 Gam-COVID-Vac and 1 mRNA1273/Gam-COVID-Vac heterologous scheme. Of these 18 non-responders, 14 received a third dose;nine patients (62%) presented anti-RBD IgG detectable. Of the five patients who did not respond to the booster vaccination, three had received BBIBP-CorV as the initial schedule and the vaccines applied as a third dose were Ad5-nCoV (1), BNT162b2 (1), AZD 1222 (2) and Gam-COVID-Vac (1). They were being treated with: rituximab (2), azathioprine (2) and mycophenolate mofetil (1). Treatment with higher doses of prednisone was the only factor associated with non-seroconversion to the third dose (8 +/- 4.5;p 0.02). Conclusion(s): The third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allowed to improve the serological response to vaccination, achieving a seroconversion of 62% in this group of patients.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is known to be reduced in the immunocompromised. However, extent to which immunity is affected by immunosuppression in specific disease cohorts remains poorly characterised. Furthermore, implications of the ongoing vaccination booster programme require further study. Individuals with lupus nephritis (LN) require prolonged high-dose immunosuppression in order to maintain disease control, rendering them important to study in this context. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody response in this cohort during the Spring/Summer 2022 booster vaccine campaign. Nucleocapsid antibody indicates previous infection whilst spike antibody indicates previous infection and/or vaccination response. Titre of spike antibody to prevent infection is not known, but presence of antibodies is likely to protect against severe disease. Methods SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antibody were measured in adult patients with LN attending a tertiary centre rheumatology clinic. Data was collected retrospectively on disease, immunosuppression, vaccine status and history of natural exposure. Results 35 cases of LN were investigated, of which LN III, IV and V were predominant biopsy diagnoses. Regarding immunosuppressants, the Eurolupus Cyclophosphamide protocol had been used in the majority of patients to achieve initial control, with 3/35 patients still receiving pulsed courses at data collection. 18/35 were on Mycophenolate Mofetil;a further 13/35 had previously received this. 31/35 took at least 5mg Prednisolone daily;25/35 took Hydroxychloroquine;7/35 took Azathioprine;7/35 had previously been on Methotrexate, 3/35 took Tacrolimus;1/35 took Ciclosporin. Regarding B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody therapy, 13/35 had received Rituximab and 8/35 were receiving Belimumab. Antibody levels were measured between 4 weeks and 13 months after last dose of vaccination;mean duration was 6 months. 11/35 had confirmed COVID-19 infection;a further 8/35 reported a possible history. Of the 35, 32 (91%) had mounted detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody above the bottom 10% of assay detection, indicating some immunity to vaccination or natural exposure. 20 (57%) had detectable nucleocapsid antibody, suggesting natural infection with antibody response. Only 2 (6%) had not mounted any antibody response. Of note, neither were fully vaccinated: one had 1 vaccination with blood test 8 months subsequent;one had 2 vaccinations with blood test 7 months subsequent. The latter was also notably on haemodialysis. All who received 3+ vaccinations had detectable spike antibody responses, as well as 75% of those who had received 2 vaccinations. Conclusion Our study is the first analysis, to our knowledge, of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in a LN cohort. Whilst neutralising capacity and level of antibody providing protection remains under research, these findings provide at least some reassurance that individuals with LN on immunosuppression are capable of mounting an immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Further work is required to establish extent and duration of protection with serial vaccinations in this cohort.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: To evaluate the immunogenicity of ChAdOx1, Coronavac and BNT162B2 vaccines in SLE patients, including homologous and heterologous immunizations. Method(s): The 'Safety and efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Disease-SAFER study' is a Brazilian multicentric longitudinal phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 Vaccine in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) in real life, started on May 2021. SLE patients (according to the 2012 SLICC classification criteria), older than 18 years of age were recruited after 2 or 3 doses of vaccine against COVID-19 (ChAdOx1, BNT162b2 and CoronaVac) and were evaluated at baseline and on the 28th day after each dose. Homologous immunization was considered if they received three doses of the same vaccine and heterologous if a different one was applied. IgG antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain were measured by chemiluminescence (SARS-CoV-2-IgG-II Quant assay, Abbott-Laboratories) at baseline and 28 days after the first, 2nd and 3rd doses (Seropositivity IgGSpike>= 7.1BAU/mL). Statistical analysis: ANOVA and pairwise comparisons tests Results: 316 SLE patients were included (255 heterologous and 61 homologous immunization), 89.2% were female and the mean age was 37.6 +/- 11.2 years. The two groups were homogeneous regarding demographical data, disease activity and immunosuppressive treatment. 49.7% used corticosteroids (alpha 5 mg/day in 52.3%), 83.5% antimalarials, 22.8% azathioprine and 20.3% mycophenolate mofetil. 207 patients received the first two doses with CoronaVac, 128 ChadOx-1 and 32 BNT162b2. Regarding the first two doses of the same vaccine, there was no difference in IgG titers over time between CoronaVac or ChadOx-1 (p = 0.313). IgG titers increased in all vaccine groups, with difference only after 2nd dose: 4.96 +/- 1.71BAU/mL CoronaVac vs. 6.00 +/- 1.99BAU/mL ChadOx-1 vs. 7.31 +/- 1.49BAU/mL BNT162b2 (p alpha 0.001). There was no difference in IgG titers over time between homologous or heterologous vaccine schedule (p = 0.872). IgG titers also increased in all groups, with difference only after 2nd dose: 5.49 +/- 1.96BAU/mL heterologous vs. 6.30 +/- 2.10BAU/mL homologous (p = 0.009). Conclusion(s): Induction of immunogenicity occurred in different vaccine regimens in SLE patients. Future research to explore different heterologous schemes in IMRD must be performed.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection relative to the general population. We aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors for serious infections in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE treated with rituximab, belimumab, and standard of care therapies in a large national observational cohort. Method(s): The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) is a UK-based prospective register of patients with SLE. Patients were recruited by their treating physician as part of their scheduled care from 64 centres across the UK by use of a standardised case report form. Inclusion criteria for the BILAG-BR included age older than 5 years, ability to provide informed consent, a diagnosis of SLE, and starting a new biological therapy within the last 12 months or a new standard of care drug within the last month. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of serious infections within the first 12 months of therapy. Serious infections were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, hospital admission, or resulting in morbidity or death. Infection and mortality data were collected from study centres and further mortality data were collected from the UK Office for National Statistics. The relationship between serious infection and drug type was analysed using a multiple-failure Cox proportional hazards model. Finding(s): Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 23, 2021, 1383 individuals were recruited to the BILAG-BR. 335 patients were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 1048 participants contributed 1002.7 person-years of follow-up and included 746 (71%) participants on rituximab, 119 (11%) participants on belimumab, and 183 (17%) participants on standard of care. The median age of the cohort was 39 years (IQR 30-50), 942 (90%) of 1048 patients were women and 106 (10%) were men. Of the patients with available ethnicity data, 514 (56%) of 911 were White, 169 (19%) were Asian, 161 (18%) were Black, and 67 (7%) were of multiple-mixed or other ethnic backgrounds. 118 serious infections occurred in 76 individuals during the 12-month study period, which included 92 serious infections in 58 individuals on rituximab, eight serious infections in five individuals receiving belimumab, and 18 serious infections in 13 individuals on standard of care. The overall crude incidence rate of serious infection was 117.7 (95% CI 98.3-141.0) per 1000 person-years. Compared with standard of care, the serious infection risk was similar in the rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.68 [0.60-4.68]) and belimumab groups (1.01 [0.21-4.80]). Across the whole cohort in multivariate analysis, serious infection risk was associated with prednisolone dose (>10 mg;2.38 [95%CI 1.47-3.84]), hypogammaglobulinaemia (<6 g/L;2.16 [1.38-3.37]), and multimorbidity (1.45 [1.17-1.80]). Additional concomitant immunosuppressive use appeared to be associated with a reduced risk (0.60 [0.41-0.90]). We found no significant safety signals regarding atypical infections. Six infection-related deaths occurred at a median of 121 days (IQR 60-151) days from cohort entry. Interpretation(s): In patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, rituximab, belimumab, and standard immunosuppressive therapy have similar serious infection risks. Key risk factors for serious infections included multimorbidity, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and increased glucocorticoid doses. When considering the risk of serious infection, we propose that immunosupppressives, rituximab, and belimumab should be prioritised as mainstay therapies to optimise SLE management and support proactive minimisation of glucocorticoid use. Funding(s): None.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
ABSTRACT
The lung is the most common organ affected by sarcoidosis. Multiple tools are available to assist clinicians in assessing lung disease activity and in excluding alternative causes of respiratory symptoms. Improving outcomes in pulmonary sarcoidosis should focus on preventing disease progression and disability, and preserving quality of life, in addition to timely identification and management of complications like fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis. While steroids continue to be first-line therapy, other therapies with fewer long-term side-effects are available and should be considered in certain circumstances. Knowledge of common clinical features of pulmonary sarcoidosis and specific pulmonary sarcoidosis phenotypes is important for identifying patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment.Copyright © ERS 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background. Vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses are reduced in patients taking lymphocyte-depleting therapies, which are commonly prescribed for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). While a third vaccine dose (D3) augments the SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike response in some patients, there is a paucity of data on the humoral response following D3 in patients with IIM. Furthermore, the durability of antibody response is unknown. In this study, we evaluated serial antibody response for three months following a 3rd dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IIM patients. Methods. Adults with a patient-reported diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy who completed three-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (two-dose BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 followed by single mRNA or adenoviral vector dose) were recruited via social media campaign. Demographics and clinical characteristics were collected via patient report. Informed consent was provided electronically. Serial antibody responses were evaluated by the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S enzyme immunoassay, which measures total antibody to the SARS-CoV-2 S-receptor binding domain (RBD) protein (range 0. 4-2500U/ mL;positive >0.8U/mL). Poor antibody response was defined as anti-RBD titer <500U/mL based on predicted correlates of protective plasma neutralizing capacity. Those with prior COVID-19 infection were excluded. Associations were evaluated using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests as appropriate. Results. We evaluated serial anti-RBD titers in 59 participants (Table I). Most (93%) were female with median (IQR) age of 51 (41-62) years. Mycophenolate mofetil was the most frequently prescribed medication (45.6%). Participants completed primary vaccination with two-dose BNT162b2(54%) or mRNA-1273(46%). Median pre-D3 anti-RBD titer (IQR) was 65.8U/mL (4.6,473) at 158 (136-183) days following primary vaccination. Dose 3 included BNT162b2(47%), mRNA-1273(47%) or Ad.26.COV2.S (6%). Most (89.9%) received homologous D3 vaccination. 39% of participants reported holding peri-D3 immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil being the most commonly held medication in the peri-D3 period. Repeat anti-RBD testing was performed at a median (IQR) 30 (28-32) days post-D3. A higher antibody titer was seen in 89.9% participants following D3 with median (IQR) titer of 2500 U/mL (92,2500). Thirty-seven percent remained <500U/mL following D3;a greater proportion of these participants reported use of rituximab and greater number of immunosuppressive therapies compared to those with anti-RBD >=500U (72.7% versus 5.4%, p<0.001;3 therapies versus 2 therapies, p=0.03). Furthermore, 13.5% (8/59) remained below the threshold of positivity following D3;7/8 reported use of rituximab, 5/8 mycophenolate mofetil, or combination of these agents (4/8). There was not a significant difference in antibody titers among recipients of homologous/heterologous vaccination (p=0.22). Dose 3 was well tolerated with only 2 (3.4%) participants reporting disease flare requiring treatment within one month of vaccination;neither required intravenous therapy or hospital admission. Thirty-four (57.6%) participants underwent repeat anti-RBD testing three months following D3 with median (IQR) 2500U/mL (456,2500);73.53% (25/34) remained above threshold of >=500U/mL. Limitations of this study include small sample size and absence of healthy control group. Diagnosis was based on participant report and we did not routinely collect information on disease activity. Conclusion. We observed an augmented humoral response in most IIM patients following 3rd dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination;antibody response was durable at three months. Dose 3 was well tolerated. Over 1/3 participants failed to develop adequate response following D3, namely those on rituximab therapy and on higher number of immunosuppressive therapies. These patients should be prioritized for prophylactic therapies to enhance protection against COVID-19 infection.
ABSTRACT
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients have been considered a higher-risk population for COVID-19 due to the high prevalence of disability and disease-modifying therapy use;however, there is little data in our Middle East and North Africa region (MENA) identifying clinical characteristics of MS associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes. Material(s) and Method(s): This a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted between March 2020 and February 2021 and included MS patients with a suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Using data collected from the MENACTRIMS registry and local COVID-19 registries, the association of patient demographics, MS disease characteristics, and use of disease-modifying therapies with outcomes and severity of COVID-19 illness were evaluated by multivariate logistic models. Result(s): A total of 600 MS patients with suspected (n=58) or confirmed (n=542) COVID-19 (mean age: 36.4 +/- 10.16 years;414 (69%) females;mean disease duration: 8.3+/- 6.6 years) were analyzed. Seventy-three patients (12.2%) had a COVID-19 severity score of 3 or more, and 15 patients (2.5%) died of COVID-19. The median EDSS was 2.0 (range, 0-9.5), and 559 patients (93.2%) were receiving disease-modifying therapy (DMT). There was a higher proportion of patients with a COVID-19 severity score of 3 or more among patients treated with DMTs relative to untreated patients (82.9% vs 17.1%;P < .001), from whom the majority (n=117;19.7%) were maintained on anti-CD20 therapies such as ocrelizumab and rituximab. Comorbidities mainly hypertension and cardiovascular diseases, progressive MS, disease duration, and EDSS were associated with severe or worse COVID-19 disease outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (odds ratio per 10 years, 1.5 [95%CI, 1.1-2.0]), male gender (OR, 2.1 [95%CI. 1.2-3.8]), obesity (OR, 2.8 [95%CI, 1.3-5.8]), and treatment ocrelizumab/rituximab (OR for ocrelizumab, 4.6 [95%CI. 1.2-17.7], OR for rituximab, 14.1 [95%CI, 4.8-41.3]) or off-label immunosuppressive medications such as azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (OR, 8.8 [95%CI. 1.7-44.0]) were risk factors for moderate to severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Surprisingly, smoking and diabetes were not identified as risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease in our cohort. Conclusion(s): In this registry-based cohort study of patients with MS, age, sex, EDSS, obesity, progressive MS were independent risk factors for severe COVID-19. Moreover, there was an association found between exposure to anti-CD20 DMTs and COVID-19 severity. Knowledge of these risk factors may help improve the clinical management of MS patients with COVID-19 infection.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
Asymptomatic subjects account for 25 to 45% of SARS-CoV-2 infections, and in particular, subjects on mild immunosuppressive therapy may have symptoms masked and could spread virus for an extended period of time. To determine the cumulative incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and associated risk factors, we conducted a prospective clinical and serological survey in a cohort of 278 liver transplant recipients (LTRs) from Central Italy. Three different serology tests were performed every 4 months in 259 LTRs between April 2020 and April 2021: one based on raw extract of whole SARS-CoV-2 virus and two on specific viral antigens (nucleoprotein and receptor binding domain) to detect specific IgG, IgM and IgA. Hundred fifteen LTRs who reported symptoms or close contact with a SARS-CoV-2-positive subject, or had a positive serological result underwent molecular testing by standard screening procedures (RT-PCR on naso-pharyngeal swab). Thirty-one past or active SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified: 14 had positive molecular test (64% symptomatic), and 17 had positive serology only (18% symptomatic). SARS-CoV-2 infection was not statistically related to gender, age, obesity, diabetes, renal impairment, type of anti-rejection therapy or time from transplant. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases (61.3%) were more frequent in males and in those with glomerular filtrate rate >50 ml/min. Overall, the addition of repeated serology to standard diagnostic molecular protocols increased detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection from 5.1% to 10.9%. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among our LTRs (11.2%) is comparable to the general population of Central Italy, considered a medium-impact area. Only one asymptomatic subject (6%) was found to carry SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory tract at the time of serological diagnosis.Copyright © 2021 The Authors
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Although cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains one of the leading causes of graft failure after heart transplantation (HTx), simultaneous thrombosis of multiple epicardial coronary arteries (CA) is an uncommon finding. Case Report: A 43-year-old male patient with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent successful HTx in 2019. The first two years after HTx were uneventful, surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) did not reveal any rejection episodes, coronary CTA revealed only minimal non-calcified CA plaques. The patient was admitted to hospital due to fever and chest pain in 2021. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate-mofetil and methylprednisolone. ECG verified sinus rhythm. Laboratory test revealed elevated hsTroponin T, NT-proBNP and CRP levels. Cytomegalovirus, SARS-CoV-2-virus and hemoculture testing was negative. Several high-titre donor-specific HLA class I and II antibodies (DSAs;including complement-binding DQ7) could have been detected since 2020. Echocardiography confirmed mildly decreased left ventricular systolic function and apical hypokinesis. EMB verified mild cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) according to ISHLT grading criteria. Cardiac MRI revealed inferobasal and apical myocardial infarction (MI);thus, an urgent coronary angiography was performed. This confirmed thrombotic occlusions in all three main epicardial CAs and in first diagonal CA. As revascularization was not feasible, antithrombotic therapy with acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel and enoxaparin was started for secondary prevention. Tests for immune system disorders, thrombophilia and cancer were negative. Patient suddenly died ten days after admission. Necropsy revealed intimal proliferation in all three main epicardial CAs, endothelitis, thrombosis, chronic pericoronary fat inflammation, fat necrosis, and subacute MI. CA vasculitis owing to persistent high-titre DSAs, chronic ABMR and acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection led to multivessel CA thrombosis and acute multiple MI. ABMR after HTx may be underdiagnosed with traditional pathological methods. Pathologies affecting coronary vasculature of HTx patients with DSAs, unique manifestations of CAV lesions and occlusive thrombosis of non-stenotic, non-atherosclerotic lesions should be emphasized.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction We present a case of myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD) requiring long-term immunosuppression triggered by a dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination. Relapsing MOGAD is thus far an unknown complication of COVID-19 vaccination. Case Description: A 58-year-old lady developed headache, nausea, dizziness, facial numbness, ataxia and slurred speech 8 days after the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccination. Her imaging showed acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) with a white matter lesion in the left cerebellum and bilateral smaller lesions. Her cerebrospinal fluid showed 38 white cells and elevated protein. She initially responded well to steroids, however relapsed with optic neuritis 7 months later, requiring long-term immunosuppres- sion with mycophenolate mofetil. Discussion Although there have been some case reports of MOGAD following COVID-19 infection, to our knowledge this is only the second reported case of MOGAD following vaccination against COVID-19, and the first such case to require long-term immunosuppression. The other reported case also occurred following the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccine, and also presented with ADEM. This is in contrast to reported cases of MOGAD following COVID-19 infection, where adults mostly presented with optic neuritis. We wanted to highlight the possibility of this vaccine-related neurological complication occurring, particularly in the context of potentially frequent ongoing COVID-19 booster vaccinations.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 is an emerging pandemic. The course and management of the disease in the liver transplant setting may be difficult due to a long-standing immunosuppressive state. In Egypt, the only available option is living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In our centre, we have transplanted 440 livers since 2008. In this study, we report a single-centre experience with COVID-19 infection in long-term liver transplant recipients. A total of 25 recipients (5.7 %) had COVID-19 infections since March 2020. Among these recipients, two developed COVID-19 infections twice, approximately three and two months apart, respectively.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s)
ABSTRACT
Background. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the common internal organ manifestation of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) that can severely affect the course and prognosis of the disease. Rituximab (RTX) has been used to treat IIM, including variants with ILD. Objectives. To describe the course of disease in IIM patients with ILD, treated with RTX in long-term follow-up. Methods. Our prospective study included 35 pts with IIM fulfilling Bohan and Peter criteria and having ILD. The mean age was 51.8+/-11.9 years, female-26 pts (74%);24 (68.5%) with antisynthetase syndrome, 5 (14.3%) dermatomyositis (DM), 5 (14.3%) with a-Pm/Scl overlap myositis and 1 (2,9%) with a-SRP necrotizing myopathy were included. 25 (71,4% ) patients had nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, 9 (25,7%) organizing pneumonia (OP) and 1 (2,9%) OP, transformed to diffuse alveolar damage. All pts had the standard examination including manual muscle testing (MMT), creatinkinase (CK) anti-Jo-1 antibodies (anti-Jo-1) assay;forced vital capacity (FVC) and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) evaluation as well as high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scanning of the chest were performed at baseline, and 36 and more months. The median disease duration was 3.2 [0.16-18] years, 21 (60%) of pts were positive for a-Jo-1 antibody. All pts received prednisolone at a mean dose of 24.3+/-13 mg/day, immunosupressants at inclusion received 25 (71%) pts: cyclophosphamide 18 , mycophenolate mofetil 6 and comdination 1;Rituximab (RTX) was administered in case of severe course of disease and intolerance or inadequate response to GC and other immunosuppressive drugs. Results. The mean follow-up period after the first infusion of RTX was 47.2+/-11.9 months. Pts received 1-11 courses of RTX . The cumulative mean dose of RTX was 4.6 +/-2.5g. MMT 8 increased from 135.8+/-13.5 to 148.75+/-3.5 (p=0.000001). CK level decreased DELTACK - 762 u/l(median 340;25th% 9;75th% 821). anti-Jo-1 decreased from 173.4+/-37 to 96.5+/-79 u/ml (p=0.00002), FVC increased from 82+/-22.6 to 96,9+/-22% (p=0.00011). DLCO increased from 51.4+/-15.2 to 60+/-77.8% (p=0.0001). The mean prednisone dose was reduced from 24.3+/-13 to 5.7+/-2.4 mg/day. 3 pts died: ILD progression was the cause of death in 1 case, 1 bacterial pneumonia and COVID19 pneumonia. Conclusions. The results of this study confirm the positive effect of RTX in IIM patients with ILD (increase of muscle strength and improve lung function, decrease in anti-Jo-1 levels) and also its good steroid-sparing effect. RTX could be considered as an effective drug for the complex therapy of IIM patients with ILD when standard therapy is ineffective or impossible.